PDA

View Full Version : Skype 2.0


tom9933
01-09-2006, 08:34 AM
Just wondered if anyone else has tried or is using this yet. I recently upgraded and did some calls this weekend and was rather impressed. There are a few tweaks that need to be made to the ui and of course you don’t get the bells and whistles like content or fecc but overall it’s a very nice little product! The only thing I haven’t tried is a multipoint but in point to point calls it’s very usable even with an upstream bandwidth of 100k. Hard to believe a free product is getting this good.

Thoughts, Comments

mazzarak
01-09-2006, 09:31 AM
Hi Tom

I've used it a couple of times with family over the internet and it seemed pretty stable. I'd used Spontania previously, and I can't really see any difference between the two, we're on 1MB broadband. I think its fantastic that this product is still free :D

senthil
01-09-2006, 10:35 AM
yes true. I am using for our bussiness and tech support for our customers.its really good software.

Senthil

tom9933
01-09-2006, 10:38 AM
Have either of you tried using it in a multipoint? I know the audio works that way but didn’t know if the video did as well. Hrmm I wonder what it would take to make a Skype to H.323 or SIP Gateway.

nordal
01-10-2006, 02:45 PM
Yup, long live Janus Friis, the great Dane and co-creator of Skype :laugh:

Timur
01-17-2006, 08:41 AM
By the way there is webcollaboration tool:
http://skype.unyte.net/skype/en-us/download.html
It works very good.

Rene
02-02-2006, 10:49 AM
Have either of you tried using it in a multipoint? I know the audio works that way but didn’t know if the video did as well. Hrmm I wonder what it would take to make a Skype to H.323 or SIP Gateway.

If one has interest in this field, check out Wigiwigi.com
The software presented on this forum is way from ready, has a poor user interface, in short - is in full development.

But it does show what is possible in the quality vs BW field with fluent sound/video delivery, and there are also some multipoint P2P (!) test-builds. (some are 12-way, and work with modest ADSL upload capacities)

IMHO it surpasses fullblown H264 quality, in demonstrator executables usually smaller than 500KB. (no installing, no DLL's, no registries - download and run in under 15 seconds)

Try it - then compare with Skype. Or Vcon. Or PVX. If nothing else, it's fun to play with.

smoody
02-03-2006, 09:52 PM
Just wondered if anyone else has tried or is using this yet. I recently upgraded and did some calls this weekend and was rather impressed. There are a few tweaks that need to be made to the ui and of course you don’t get the bells and whistles like content or fecc but overall it’s a very nice little product! The only thing I haven’t tried is a multipoint but in point to point calls it’s very usable even with an upstream bandwidth of 100k. Hard to believe a free product is getting this good.

Thoughts, Comments

Hey Tom,

I'm also very impressed with Skype's video/audio quality, especially being free. However one potential issue I came across while doing some research has to do with "supernodes" and how it could potentially adversly effect a network segment. I'd encourage you and everyone else interested on using Skype to do some research around the supernode issue and decide if it's right for your specific environment.

tom9933
02-04-2006, 07:21 PM
Ah yes I remember reading something about that long ago. As I recall it was a discussion about supernodes eating all of your bandwidth. I’ll have to look into that again as I don’t remember all the specifics, but I do remember it was an issue that brought up some concern in the internet community.
Thanks for the reminder :)

bestown
03-09-2006, 05:52 PM
Is 2.0 a beta version?